“A brand is the set of expectations, memories, stories and relationships that, taken together, account for a consumer’s decision to choose one product or service over another.” – Seth Godin

Information Bank

Examination of Copyright Application

As one of the most sought-after voices in Indian copyright law, MAK LAW is dedicated to providing clients with comprehensive legal insights on various aspects of copyright protection. One crucial step in the copyright registration process is the examination of the copyright application by the Copyright Office. This article aims to provide an in-depth understanding of the examination process of copyright applications in India, including opposition, objections, and discrepancies, and the role of MAK LAW in assisting clients in this process.

Examination of Copyright Application:

Under the Copyright Act of India, the examination of a copyright application is a critical step to ensure that the application meets the requirements for copyright protection. Once a copyright application is filed with the Copyright Office, it goes through a thorough examination process to determine its compliance with the relevant laws and regulations. The examination is conducted by the Copyright Office to verify the accuracy and completeness of the application and to ensure that it meets the statutory requirements for copyright protection.

The examination process includes reviewing the copyright application for compliance with the Copyright Act of India, the Copyright Rules of 2013, and other relevant regulations. The Copyright Office checks various aspects of the application, including the originality of the work, the eligibility for copyright protection, the accuracy of the information provided, and the compliance with formalities and procedures.

Opposition to Copyright Application:

During the examination process, third parties have the opportunity to oppose the copyright application if they believe that the work does not meet the requirements for copyright protection or if they have any other valid grounds for opposition. Opposition can be filed by any person claiming to be the owner of the copyright in the same work, or any person who has a substantial interest in the subject matter of the copyright.

The grounds for opposition may include lack of originality, absence of copyrightable subject matter, violation of moral rights, and other statutory or procedural deficiencies. Opposition to a copyright application must be filed in writing with the Copyright Office, specifying the grounds for opposition and providing supporting evidence.

Upon receipt of an opposition, the Copyright Office will notify the applicant and provide an opportunity for a hearing. The applicant has the right to respond to the opposition and provide evidence in support of the copyright application. The Copyright Office will consider the opposition and the response of the applicant before making a decision on the copyright application.

Objection to Copyright Application:

In addition to opposition, the Copyright Office may raise objections during the examination process if they identify any deficiencies or discrepancies in the copyright application. Objections are usually raised in writing, specifying the grounds for objection and providing an opportunity for the applicant to respond.

Objections may arise due to various reasons, including incomplete or inaccurate information, failure to meet formalities and procedures, or non-compliance with the Copyright Act and Rules. The applicant must address the objections raised by the Copyright Office and provide appropriate clarifications or corrections.

The applicant’s response to objections should be submitted within the specified timeframe, along with any additional evidence or documents to support the copyright application. The Copyright Office will review the response and make a decision based on the merits of the case.

Discrepancy in Copyright Application:

During the examination process, the Copyright Office may identify any discrepancies or inconsistencies in the copyright application. The Copyright Office can issue an objection notice, seeking clarification or rectification of the application within thirty days from the receipt of the notice.

Objections can be raised under section 13 of the Copyright Act, 1957, for various reasons. For instance, the application may lack information such as the details of the owner, author, or work, or the application may have missing documents such as the power of attorney, or the application may contain incorrect or false information. The objection notice issued by the Copyright Office typically lists the discrepancies that need to be rectified.

If the Copyright Office raises objections, the applicant can file a written response within thirty days, along with supporting documents and evidence, clarifying the discrepancies. The Copyright Office may then request further clarification or evidence from the applicant. It is important to note that the Copyright Office’s decision on objections is final, and no appeal can be made against its decision.

In some cases, the Copyright Office may raise opposition to the application, usually by a third party. Opposition proceedings can be initiated by any person within thirty days from the date of publication of the copyright application in the Official Gazette. The grounds for opposition can be similar to objections, such as incorrect or false information or an incomplete application.

Opposition proceedings are conducted before the Registrar of Copyrights, who may also call for evidence and documentation from both parties before making a decision. The Registrar can either dismiss the opposition or accept it and refuse to grant the copyright. If the opposition is accepted, the applicant can appeal the decision to the Copyright Board within three months.

In conclusion, copyright examination is a crucial step in the copyright registration process, and it is important to ensure that the application is complete and accurate to avoid objections or opposition. Hiring a team of experienced copyright lawyers can ensure that the application is thoroughly reviewed and any discrepancies or inconsistencies are identified and addressed before submission.